首页> 外文OA文献 >Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year Results: Implications for Cosmology
【2h】

Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year Results: Implications for Cosmology

机译:威尔金森微波各向异性探测器(Wmap)三年结果:   对宇宙学的启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A simple cosmological model with only six parameters (matter density, Omega_mh^2, baryon density, Omega_b h^2, Hubble Constant, H_0, amplitude offluctuations, sigma_8, optical depth, tau, and a slope for the scalarperturbation spectrum, n_s) fits not only the three year WMAP temperature andpolarization data, but also small scale CMB data, light element abundances,large-scale structure observations, and the supernova luminosity/distancerelationship. Using WMAP data only, the best fit values for cosmologicalparameters for the power-law flat LCDM model are (Omega_m h^2, Omega_b h^2, h,n_s, tau, sigma_8) = 0.1277+0.0080-0.0079, 0.02229+-0.00073, 0.732+0.031-0.032,0.958+-0.016, 0.089+-0.030, 0.761+0.049-0.048). The three year datadramatically shrink the allowed volume in this six dimensional parameter space.Assuming that the primordial fluctuations are adiabatic with a power lawspectrum, the WMAP data_alone_ require dark matter, and favor a spectral indexthat is significantly less than the Harrison-Zel'dovich-Peebles scale-invariantspectrum (n_s=1, r=0). Models that suppress large-scale power through a runningspectral index or a large-scale cut-off in the power spectrum are a better fitto the WMAP and small scale CMB data than the power-law LCDM model; however,the improvement in the fit to the WMAP data is only Delta chi^2 = 3 for 1 extradegree of freedom. The combination of WMAP and other astronomical data yieldssignificant constraints on the geometry of the universe, the equation of stateof the dark energy, the gravitational wave energy density, and neutrinoproperties. Consistent with the predictions of simple inflationary theories, wedetect no significant deviations from Gaussianity in the CMB maps.
机译:一个仅具有六个参数(物质密度,Omega_mh ^ 2,重子密度,Omega_b h ^ 2,哈勃常数,H_0,振幅偏移,sigma_8,光学深度,tau和标量摄动谱的斜率n_s)的简单宇宙学模型拟合不仅包括WMAP的三年温度和极化数据,还包括小规模CMB数据,轻元素丰度,大规模结构观测以及超新星的光度/距离关系。仅使用WMAP数据,幂律平面LCDM模型的宇宙学参数的最佳拟合值为(Omega_m h ^ 2,Omega_b h ^ 2,h,n_s,tau,sigma_8)= 0.1277 + 0.0080-0.0079,0.02229 + -0.00073 ,0.732 + 0.031-0.032、0.958 + -0.016、0.089 + -0.030、0.761 + 0.049-0.048)。三年的数据戏剧性地缩小了这六维参数空间中的允许体积。假设原始波动是幂幂谱绝热的,则WMAP data_alone_需要暗物质,并且需要一个明显小于Harrison-Zel'dovich- Peebles尺度不变谱(n_s = 1,r = 0)。与幂律LCDM模型相比,通过运行频谱索引或功率谱中的大规模截止来抑制大规模功率的模型更适合WMAP和小规模CMB数据。但是,对于1个额外的自由度,对WMAP数据拟合的改进仅为Delta chi ^ 2 = 3。 WMAP和其他天文数据的组合对宇宙的几何形状,暗能量的状态方程,引力波能量密度和中微子特性产生了重大限制。与简单的通货膨胀理论的预测一致,我们在CMB地图中未发现与高斯性的显着偏差。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号